The takeover, the ultimate goal for the Illuminati. A one world government that owns all big business and makes the average citizens work as slaves. They’re almost there, most people seemingly work as slaves now, paid slaves, but slaves none the less. While some say that this is the goal they are working to some argue that this is almost complete and that right now you have basically need to work to get your food, shelter, clothing, etc… One issue though, you could always live off the land . In most countries you’re free to go out and set up shop anywhere as long as it isn’t privately owned. As far as I’m aware there’s still sun, land, water, and air to grow your own food. And living near a wooded area I’m positive there’s still wildlife you could kill for food. Last time I went fishing I do believe there were fish still living in waters. Cotton still grows, animals still have hides, so clothing is there. There is still tons of mud, clay, snow, caves, and timber to make your own house. So we’re not really slaves, you don’t have to work but you choose to so you can obtain the perks not the necessities. So they must be plotting to set it up that way right?
It’s 2011, we know for a fact the Illuminati started in 1776 at the very least (some conspiracy theorists don’t accept that and say much earlier). But taking that timeline they have been active for at least two hundred and thirty five years. Why are they waiting? They may not have been as strong at first but why wait over two hundred and thirty years? You’re telling me it’s easier to create a one world government and enslave people now? In 1900 there were about 1.5 Billion people on Earth, now there's about 7 billion, and almost everyone is educated and weapons of military grade are easily acquirable. It would make no sense, if you’re going into a tiger cage to fight a tiger you don’t wait until there 6 billion more tigers in there to make your move. Plus the global elite would only be about five thousand people tops, five thousand people are not going to hold everyone back if they tried. Their solution is what at the point that people say fuck you? Poison the people working for them? Killing their slaves? Paying people? All that does is make their money useless and create the same thing we have now with the poor, middle, and elite classes. So how does this work? Why is their money useful at this point?
So they have all the money, they own all land, and the people are working for them. What’s changed? We do that now and they own everything now. I know, people will lose the opportunity to open their own business and middle class will be gone. It’s pretty much happening now, you’re either rich or poor and the poor have a very hard time getting in a position to open their own business. So, maybe they already have implemented that part. But what would be the point? They aren’t going to allow many people like them so eventually much of the rich now would become poor, and like I estimated at tops only about five thousand people will remain “elite”. Now that would seem to me that at this point their money becomes nothing, only they have and use it, it goes nowhere. Anyone who is rich really has the financial means to do anything they want already, they already own much of everything or have stock in it with one another. We wouldn't be paying for anything so they are the only ones buying from their own businesses. If you think about it for a second once it happens all their money is no good, their businesses love most revenue, and they will be very very bored. The only “goal” would be a one world government.
Yes, one world government, which for some reason people think is wrong. The fear is understandable, the United States beat it into everyone’s head during the cold war that socialism and communism was out for global domination of citizens. Apparently that fear is still alive today. What does a one world government mean? A group of people control the world, which to me at least does not signal evil doom. Every system you’re in you're being controlled by a ruler. Socialist society, Capitalist society, Communist society, and so on. There’s always a leader or group of people who can tell you what to do and when to do it. A one world government in terms of leadership is not a change. Let’s also face the facts, every system that has been brought forth so far is failing. Socialism becomes extreme and taxes get too high at a point, capitalism is allowing people to die because they can’t afford or get health care, communism is just terrible for the human species. Who says that a new system will be anything like the old? We hear talk of a “New” World Order. That says to me something new, nothing to do with the old. Who says a NWO wouldn’t consist of true religious freedom, a perfect blend of democracy, the perfect mix between government ran businesses and capitalistic opportunities. A one world government would certainly stop wars on a large scale. There will be civil wars and things of that nature but no global nuke dropping wars. You don’t have to worry about this dollar being worth more than this dollar and this dollar crumbling because that dollar got a raise. So no systems will collapse quickly because the kids on the currency block started picking on your currency. Someone needs to explain this to me, why is a NWO surely bad for us?
No comments:
Post a Comment